It's normal. Mochizuki likes to make all the characters love each other. Whether in romantic relationships and Platonic love, including family It's just that some of her characters might be lgbt+.

For example, Eliot (Pandora Hearts) in Guidebook Vol.18.5 has clearly stated that he is gay and not interested in women.

In the bonus manga, Eliot is shown to be interested in men, with Mochizuki drawing him as a male cat.

-Eliot will be thrilled — If Eliot meet a male cat.

—But if he meets a female cat that flirts with him , he will make a disgusted face.

In Vanitas, Mochizuki hints that some characters are bisexual for example, Vanitas.

(because Japanese writers don't give clear interviews about lgbt+ characters, sometimes there's ambiguity in the interviews about the characters' gender identities.)

@Honh-Ih4X3 hello there. i need to ask you to please stop spreading misinformation. these things you are proclaiming as fact are NOT TRUE.

you cite the sketch comic of elliot reacting positively to cheshire and negatively to catgirl ada as confirmation that he is gay. this is a complete egregious leap in logic. indeed you can argue the reason for the difference in demeanor is due to sexuality; however that is not the only reason. canonically elliot likes cats, all and any cats, and cheshire aside from being male is a real cat regardless of humanoid appearance. and elliot dislikes ada personally, it is not a case of his sexual or romantic preferences.

i have already stated in a reply to your comments on jeanne's page as to why it cannot be said with certainty that vanitas is bisexual. i will not repeat myself. please read my replies to your comments again.

there is something you need to understand. there is no issue with forming your own interpretations and beliefs and even considering parts of canon to support your interpretation. but unless something is explicit and irrefutable and holds no other possible explanation, it is only that. an interpretation and nothing else—most definitely NOT canon confirmed fact. you cannot treat hints that are purposefully kept vague and unspoken, or lighthearted jokes as undeniable fact that supports what you personally believe.

i would like to give you the benefit of the doubt, because i truly believe you have no ill intent. but you are parroting outright incorrect statements as canon fact on a constant basis—this counts as misinformation. what you are doing is on the verge of being harmful to the wikia and community. if you continue this, i WILL be forced to take some measure of disciplinary action.

You’re so cool. I wonder how are you able to talk so…smart? Idk haha Its just I probably would not able to do that. (It’s just a silly comment)

😭 thank you, you're very sweet!